WHAT ONE WOMAN CAN DO
Wangari
Maathai:

Wangari Maathai of Kenya (whom we had the honor
of meeting several years ago) illustrates the power of what one woman can
do—her grassroots Greenbelt Movement changed her people and her nation.
Here are excerpts from her Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech:
Although this prize comes to me, it acknowledges the work of countless
individuals and groups across the globe. They work quietly and often
without recognition to protect the environment, promote democracy, defend
human rights and ensure equality between women and men. By so doing, they
plant seeds of peace.
In this year’s prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has placed the
critical issue of environment and its linkage to democracy and peace
before the world. For their visionary action, I am profoundly grateful.
Recognizing that sustainable development, democracy and peace are
indivisible is an idea whose time has come. Our work over the past 30
years has always appreciated and engaged these linkages.
My inspiration partly comes from my childhood experiences and observations
of Nature in rural Kenya. It has been influenced and nurtured by the
formal education I was privileged to receive in Kenya, the United States
and Germany. As I was growing up, I witnessed forests being cleared and
replaced by commercial plantations, which destroyed local biodiversity and
the capacity of the forests to conserve water.
In 1977, when we started the Green Belt Movement, I was partly responding
to needs identified by rural women, namely lack of firewood, clean
drinking water, balanced diets, shelter and income.
Throughout Africa, women are the primary caretakers, holding significant
responsibility for tilling the land and feeding their families. As a
result, they are often the first to become aware of environmental damage
as resources become scarce and incapable of sustaining their families.
The women we worked with recounted that unlike in the past, they were
unable to meet their basic needs. This was due to the degradation of their
immediate environment as well as the introduction of commercial farming,
which replaced the growing of household food crops. But international
trade controlled the price of the exports from these small-scale farmers
and a reasonable and just income could not be guaranteed. I came to
understand that when the environment is destroyed, plundered or
mismanaged, we undermine our quality of life and that of future
generations.
Tree planting became a natural choice to address some of the initial basic
needs identified by women. Also, tree planting is simple, attainable and
guarantees quick, successful results within a reasonable amount time. This
sustains interest and commitment.
So, together, we have planted over 30 million trees that provide fuel,
food, shelter, and income to support their children’s education and
household needs. The activity also creates employment and improves soils
and watersheds. Through their involvement, women gain some degree of power
over their lives, especially their social and economic position and
relevance in the family. This work continues.
Initially, the work was difficult because historically our people have
been persuaded to believe that because they are poor, they lack not only
capital, but also knowledge and skills to address their challenges.
Instead they are conditioned to believe that solutions to their problems
must come from ‘outside’. Further, women did not realize that meeting
their needs depended on their environment being healthy and well managed.
They were also unaware that a degraded environment leads to a scramble for
scarce resources and may culminate in poverty and even conflict. They were
also unaware of the injustices of international economic arrangements.
In order to assist communities to understand these linkages, we developed
a citizen education program, during which people identify their problems,
the causes and possible solutions. They then make connections between
their own personal actions and the problems they witness in the
environment and in society.
In the process, the participants discover that they must be part of the
solutions. They realize their hidden potential and are empowered to
overcome inertia and take action. They come to recognize that they are the
primary custodians and beneficiaries of the environment that sustains
them.
Entire communities also come to understand that while it is necessary to
hold their governments accountable, it is equally important that in their
own relationships with each other, they exemplify the leadership values
they wish to see in their own leaders, namely justice, integrity and
trust.
Although initially the Green Belt Movement’s tree planting activities did
not address issues of democracy and peace, it soon became clear that
responsible governance of the environment was impossible without
democratic space. Therefore, the tree became a symbol for the democratic
struggle in Kenya. Citizens were mobilised to challenge widespread abuses
of power, corruption and environmental mismanagement.
Through the Green Belt Movement, thousands of ordinary citizens were
mobilized and empowered to take action and effect change. They learned to
overcome fear and a sense of helplessness and moved to defend democratic
rights.
In time, the tree also became a symbol for peace and conflict resolution,
especially during ethnic conflicts in Kenya when the Green Belt Movement
used peace trees to reconcile disputing communities. During the ongoing
re-writing of the Kenyan constitution, similar trees of peace were planted
in many parts of the country to promote a culture of peace. Using trees as
a symbol of peace is in keeping with a widespread African tradition.
Such practices are part of an extensive cultural heritage, which
contributes both to the conservation of habitats and to cultures of peace.
With the destruction of these cultures and the introduction of new values,
local biodiversity is no longer valued or protected and as a result, it is
quickly degraded and disappears. For this reason, The Green Belt Movement
explores the concept of cultural biodiversity, especially with respect to
indigenous seeds and medicinal plants.
As we progressively understood the causes of environmental degradation, we
saw the need for good governance. Indeed, the state of any county’s
environment is a reflection of the kind of governance in place, and
without good governance there can be no peace. Many countries, which have
poor governance systems, are also likely to have conflicts and poor laws
protecting the environment.
In 2002, the courage, resilience, patience and commitment of members of
the Green Belt Movement, other civil society organizations, and the Kenyan
public culminated in the peaceful transition to a democratic government
and laid the foundation for a more stable society.
It is 30 years since we started this work. Activities that devastate the
environment and societies continue unabated. Today we are faced with a
challenge that calls for a shift in our thinking, so that humanity stops
threatening its life-support system. We are called to assist the Earth to
heal her wounds and in the process heal our own – indeed, to embrace the
whole creation in all its diversity, beauty and wonder. This will happen
if we see the need to revive our sense of belonging to a larger family of
life, with which we have shared our evolutionary process.
In the course of history, there comes a time when humanity is called to
shift to a new level of consciousness, to reach a higher moral ground. A
time when we have to shed our fear and give hope to each other.
That time is now.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has challenged the world to broaden the
understanding of peace: there can be no peace without equitable
development; and there can be no development without sustainable
management of the environment in a democratic and peaceful space. This
shift is an idea whose time has come.
(See the whole speech
at
www.wangarimaathai.com and, in North America,
www.gbmna.org. The Wangari Maathai Foundation is at
www.wangari-maathai.org.)